Monday, February 29, 2016

The Disturbing Thing You Missed During Chris Rock's Monologue


So last night during the 88th Academy Awards, comedian Chris Rock, in his opening monologue, decided to tackle the hot button issue of racism in Hollywood that has caused this year’s Academy Awards to be so controversial.  While making several good points—the need for movie studios to consider black actors and actresses for more prominent roles in movies—Chris spoke about racism in Hollywood in a very charming and funny way that filled the whole house with laughter.  Like the guy who jokes at a funeral luncheon to cheer everyone up, Chris did a good job of lightening the mood for the rest of the Oscars.

However, there was one thing in his monologue that Christ said that actually disturbed me.  It disturbed me because of the way the crowd reacted to what he said.  So what was said?  Well, he said this: “I’m sure there were no black nominees some of those years. Say ‘62 or ‘63, and black people did not protest.  Why? Because we had real things to protest at the time, you know? We had real things to protest; you know, we’re too busy being raped and lynched to care about who won best cinematographer. You know, when your grandmother’s swinging from a tree, it’s really hard to care about best documentary foreign short.

 
The reason this part of Chris’ monologue disturbed me had nothing to do with what he said, but the fact that the crowd laughed it off as a joke.  Now, in their defense, Chris delivered these sentences in a very comedic way with the intention of getting laughter as a response.  However, how can we laugh at something that isn’t funny?  I’m sorry, but the lynching of black people and the raping of black people throughout the history of our country is not funny, and to laugh at it is to make light of the seriousness of those crimes against the black community.

This reaction also disturbed me because it also downplays the reality that racism and violence towards the black community is still prevalent today.  To laugh it off as a joke is to send a message that we, as a society, aren’t going to take this seriously and it is okay to act with racism and violence as long as we can have a good giggle about it afterwards!”  But since it comes from the mouth of a black man we can laugh, right?!  Wrong!

Yes, I know that comedians are supposed to say controversial things in order to get laughs out of people.  In many ways, comedians will say truthful things that need to be said, but because they say them in a funny way that makes us all laugh, we can make light of them like they don’t really matter.  I feel that comedians are really prophets in disguise.

What is probably most disturbing about this is the fact that, to me, this signifies that we as a country don’t want to face up to our problems.  We would rather face the truth through jokes and laughter so we can discredit it as something we need to address and deal with.  Now, don’t get me wrong, comedy has its place and I love going and listening to comedians rant about how life can be hilarious at times.  However, no one can deny that it is hard to take something seriously when we all laugh at it like a joke. 

It makes me wonder if we have so separated ourselves from the violence and the hatred in our country that all we do now is laugh when someone brings it up.  Maybe its all we think we can do?  Maybe its how we cope with it.  Maybe, if we can laugh at it, we can remove some of the shame and the guilt of our indifference.  Whatever the reason, we would much rather someone like Chris Rock give us a joke about our problems rather than sit down and have an honest discussion about them. 
 
See you in the conversation,
Pastor Zach

1 comment:

  1. Yes! I definitely felt "uneasy" (not amused) by that statement. But in some ways it did it's job by causing people to reflect (internally) to their external reaction.

    The other comment Chris made that struck me was about why, in a society that talks about breaking down the lines that divide people, we still have separate categories for "Actors" and "Actresses". We, as humans, seem to be wired into categorizing and ranking everything in our world. Perhaps that is part of "original sin", since it clearly restricts relationship?

    ReplyDelete